PDA

View Full Version : Firearms of the Future


Lionheart77
12-23-2002, 19:33
Anyone familiar with this?
Guns that only fire by the owner?

TRENTON, N.J. (Dec. 23) - New Jersey on Monday became the first state to enact ''smart gun'' legislation that would eventually require new handguns to contain a mechanism that allows only their owners to fire them.

Gov. James E. McGreevey signed the bill into law requiring the ''smart guns,'' but the rule will not go into effect immediately because the technology is still under development. It could be years before it becomes a reality.

''This is common-sense legislation. There are safety regulations on cars, on toys. It's clearly time we have safety regulations on handguns,'' McGreevey said at Monday's signing ceremony.

Under the New Jersey law, smart-gun technology will be required in all new handguns sold three years after the state attorney general determines a smart gun prototype is safe and commercially available.

The New Jersey Institute of Technology is developing a smart gun prototype that would use sensors on the pistol grip to identify a user.

The owner would have his or her grip programmed at a gun shop or police range by practice-firing the weapon. A microchip in the weapon would remember the grip and determine in an instant whether the authorized user was holding the weapon. If not, the gun would not fire.

Supporters say the law will help prevent accidental gun deaths and suicides.

But opponents argued that it makes little sense to legislate about a technology that does not yet exist and have raised questions about its reliability.

''No technology is foolproof,'' said Nancy Ross, spokeswoman for the Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs. ''Anyone who has a computer knows how many times it crashes.''

Lupey
12-24-2002, 06:09
"common sense legislation" = gun control

Lionheart77
12-25-2002, 20:27
LoL @ Paul Nunis.
I didn't even think of it that way.
:p

DelC
12-28-2002, 23:50
Originally posted by Lionheart77
Anyone familiar with this?

. . . But opponents argued that it makes little sense to legislate about a technology that does not yet exist and have raised questions about its reliability. . . That technology has been around for at least 10-years. I think there has even been 1-2 dept's that have had it, or may still have it. I can't imagine why they say it's not available.

Zach427
01-03-2003, 21:03
this idea is kind of like the cars that require u to blow through the tube to check if uve had too much to drink before it would start. its a great idea.....but it will defintley have drawbacks. what if it dosent work in an emergency....then it will take a life.
zach