Results 16 to 20 of 20
Thread: HSI going from age 37 to 40
-
05-20-2012, 00:58 #16
Chief
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- here
- Posts
- 1,572
Issa loves HSI, ICE, really e erything to do with immigration. When you get a chance google the two topics together.
"For me, to live is Christ, to die is gain."
Phil 1:21
-
05-20-2012, 10:54 #17
Officer


- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- NYC
- Posts
- 270
I stand corrected, I just knew it wasn't that other idiot, Issa.. Way to many "idiots" to keep straight..
"He pulls a knife, you pull a gun, he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue, that's the Chicago way.."
-
05-20-2012, 17:09 #18
Chief
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,576
Lavish Federal Retirements | Congressman John J. Duncan, Jr.: Serving Tennessee's 2nd District
By the way, he is not insisting that those already on board have their retirements changed.
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/oc...-on-early-for/
He has been talking about this since 2010. I personally never saw it gain much traction. Funny thing is Corporate America would love to early-out employees, versus continue to keep them at full salary until mandatory retirement. This congressman thinks paying us full salary and benefits is cheaper than retiring us ?
Some of us, like me, can go at age 48, with 25 years 6(c) time. They can retire me, pay me my High-3 which under FERS is not a major component of the retirement (TSP is), then allow me to draw my TSP (which I paid into, fair and square under the law and regulations), OR pay me $120K (GS-13) X 9 more years ? That is almost 1.1 M more to "keep me."
Now, these rocket scientists want to "change" the "retirement system" to in the name of "financial wisdom" and now how many 6(c), 1811s, 1896/BP, etc are kept on payroll ? Lets just say 1,500 people are eligible at age 50 but kept till 57 now. 7 years X 120K = 840,000 extra in salary alone, not to mention annual leave (salary paid to employee but employee is not working) etc stuff.
840K X 1500 people = 1,260,000,000
So this plan will cost 1.2B to implement !!!!!!
Or they cut us loose when we are eligible/want to retire and the primary "cost" is the TSP which we are entitled to anyway ?
No, I am not gonna loose sleep that this passes......back to regular programming.Last edited by satpak77; 05-20-2012 at 17:32.
-
05-20-2012, 17:17 #19
Chief
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,576
-
06-19-2012, 08:34 #20



2Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks